Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Only the proposition expressed by 'Hesperus is Phosphorus... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The propositions expressed by 'Hesperus is Hesperus' and 'Hesperus is Phosphorus' differ.

    Only the proposition expressed by 'Hesperus is Phosphorus' has predicational/unsaturated constituents corresponding to 'Phosphorus'.

    Philosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of Language

    Related

    The propositions expressed by 'Hesperus is Hesperus' and 'Hesperus is Phosphorus...

    Similar

    The propositions expressed by 'Hesperus is Hesperus' and 'Hesperus is ...87%

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    'Mark Twain is Samuel Clemens' and 'Samuel Clemens is Samuel Clemens' ...84%
    It allows distinguishing the trivial proposition 'Hesperus is Hesperus...83%
    The sentences 'Mark Twain is Samuel Clemens' and 'Samuel Clemens is Sa...83%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: logical-form
    View source passageHide passage
    where ‘\(E(x)\)’ and ‘\(M(x)\)’ indicate different functions, specified (respectively) in terms of evenings and mornings. This leaves room for the discovery that the complex predicates ‘\(E(x) \land S(x)\)’ and ‘\(M(x) \land S(x)\)’ both indicate functions that map Venus and nothing else to the truth-value T. The hypothesis was that the propositions expressed with ‘Hesperus is bright’ and ‘Phosphorus is bright’ have different (fundamental) constituents, even though Hesperus is Phosphorus, but n

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective