Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Only well-defined probative systems are suitable for dete... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Rigid rods and ideal clocks are unsuitable for determining the inherent structures of spacetime postulated by the theory of relativity.

    Only well-defined probative systems are suitable for determining the inherent structures of spacetime.

    CausationModality & Possibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityCausation

    Connections

    1 topic

    Perception2 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Rigid rods and ideal clocks are relativistically ill-defined probative systems.Rigid rods and ideal clocks are unsuitable for determining the inherent structur...

    Similar

    Rigid rods and ideal clocks are relativistically ill-defined probative...75%Because spacetime geometry is a dynamical variable, time must also be ...75%The spacetime metric is fully determined by the inertial and causal st...74%Quantum probabilities and quantum computing do not vindicate a discret...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: weyl
    View source passageHide passage
    It should be noted, however, that Weyl’s defence of his theory implicitly addresses an important methodological consideration concerning the relation between theory and evidence. As Pauli puts it above, according to Weyl “the metric field must not be defined by means of information taken from these measuring instruments [rigid rods and ideal clocks]”. That is, Weyl rejects Einstein’s operational standpoint which gives operational significance to the metric field in terms of the observable b

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective