Ontological commitment tracks what a theory's truth genuinely requires the existence of, and this requirement is sensitive to asymmetric essential dependencies that necessity, being symmetric, cannot capture.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
When two things are treated differently or unequally, rather than being balanced or fair—like giving one side of an argument more weight than the other.
ontological commitment(Used to derive that literal truth of 'a is F' entails existence of a)
The criterion by which acceptance of a sentence as literally true commits one to the existence of the objects referred to by singular terms in that sentence, provided the sentence cannot be paraphrased away.