Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Ordinary speakers' intuitive concept of 'what is said' do... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Semantic content should be redefined to match conventional meaning, disambiguation, and reference resolution rather than expanding it to include pragmatically derived propositions.

    Ordinary speakers' intuitive concept of 'what is said' does not align with semantic content strictly determined by linguistic conventions.

    Philosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of Language

    Related

    Expanding the boundary of semantic content to fit ordinary usage would conflate ...Semantic content should be redefined to match conventional meaning, disambiguati...The mismatch between semantic content and intuitive 'what is said' is not an obj...

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The concept of 'what is said' is fundamentally a pragmatic concept, no...89%The mismatch between semantic content and intuitive 'what is said' is ...87%The ordinary concept of 'what is said' is satisfied by pragmatically d...84%The level corresponding to Grice's 'what is said' is determined not on...83%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: pragmatics
    View source passageHide passage
    Cappelen and Lepore are both literalists and minimalists. They use the term ‘semantic content’ for propositions determined solely by conventions of meaning, precisification, disambiguation and reference fixing. They allow that semantic content, so conceived, is often not what ordinary speakers would identify as ‘what is said’; but they take what is said to be a pragmatic concept, and so do not see this as an objection to their scheme. The semantic content of John’s utterance above, for example,

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective