Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Our effectiveness as agents depends on our not continuing to experience a transient state of affairs once information from it has been absorbed.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
William James's 'specious present' demonstrates that consciousness inherently integrates persisting temporal windows, not discrete snapshot registrations.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Effective action often requires sustained perceptual dwelling—a musician tracking a phrase or a hunter tracking motion cannot function on instantaneous registrations alone.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The claim confuses the functional role of memory consolidation with the phenomenological structure of experience, which legitimately overlaps past and present.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Husserl's retention-protention structure shows that the 'just-past' remains phenomenally present as constitutive of temporal object perception, not as inefficiency.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Agents perceiving moving objects, spoken words, or melodies require retentional continuity within experience itself, meaning lingering experience is constitutive of agency, not contrary to it.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Incoming information, once registered, must move into memory to make way for more up-to-date information.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Although things change slowly relative to the speed of light or sound, they do change.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
We cannot afford to be simultaneously processing conflicting information.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.