Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Our pre-vital nonexistence and our posthumous nonexistenc... — Carmelics
    Home/Afterlife & Death
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→It is irrational to object to death (assuming it ends our existence).

    Our pre-vital nonexistence and our posthumous nonexistence are symmetrical, alike in all relevant respects, so any objection to the one would apply to the other.

    Afterlife & Death
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Afterlife & Death

    Related

    It is irrational to object to death (assuming it ends our existence).The way things were for us while not existing before birth is just like the way ...We do not find it objectionable that we failed to exist prior to being alive.

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Afterlife & Death
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The asymmetry in our attitudes toward prenatal and posthumous nonexist...84%The way things were for us while not existing before birth is just lik...75%We do not find it objectionable that we failed to exist prior to being...75%If posthumous events thwart desires we held while alive, then those ev...73%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: death
    View source passageHide passage
    According to his symmetry argument, it is irrational to object to death, assuming it ends our existence, since we do not find it objectionable that we failed to exist prior to being alive, and the way things were for us while not existing then is just like the way things will be for us after death ends our existence; our pre-vital nonexistence and our posthumous nonexistence are symmetrical, alike in all relevant respects, so that any objection to the one would apply to the other.

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective