Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that P.F. Strawson argues in 'Individuals' that ascribing psychological predicates to oneself is only possible within a framework that applies them to others.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
We can directly access our own mental states in ways unavailable to others, providing immediate grounds for self-ascription.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Children apply psychological predicates to themselves before developing robust other-ascriptions, contradicting Strawson's requirement.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Even if language is social, the phenomenological content of self-knowledge may not depend on others' conceptual frameworks.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Self-ascription of pain requires criteria for correct application; criteria emerge only through public language-use with others.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Without observing psychological states in others, we lack the conceptual framework to identify them in ourselves.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Privacy alone cannot establish meaning; psychological concepts gain content through inter-subjective practice and verification.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.