Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    ≤_P is reflexive: every problem is reducible to itself. — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The polynomial time many-one reducibility relation ≤_P is a preorder (reflexive and transitive).

    ≤_P is reflexive: every problem is reducible to itself.

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Causation1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The polynomial time many-one reducibility relation ≤_P is a preorder (reflexive ...≤_P is transitive: the composition of two polynomial time computable functions i...

    Similar

    If P1 is reducible to P2, a solution of P2 would yield a solution of P...80%The structure of reducibility among these problems yields at least one...79%Every language is polynomial time reducible to itself (reflexivity)79%A problem reducible from a complete problem for a class, and itself in...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: computational-complexity
    View source passageHide passage
    For instance, the following is often described as the single most important open question in all of theoretical computer science: Open Question 1 Is \(\textbf{P}\) properly contained in \(\textbf{NP}\)? 1. 3 Reductions and \(\textbf{NP}\)-completeness Having now introduced some of the major classes studied in complexity theory, we next turn to the question of their internal structure. This can be studied using the notions of the reducibility of one problem to another and of a problem being comp

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective