Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Pappus's theorem must be assumed as an independent axiom to guarantee commutativity of the coordinate field, revealing an algebraic presupposition external to projective geometry.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Pappus follows from Desargues's theorem plus commutativity assumptions, so calling it 'independent' conflates logical and foundational independence.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Non-commutative coordinate rings can represent projective geometries validly; commutativity is a choice, not a logical necessity from axioms.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The claim assumes 'projective geometry' requires coordinatization; pure synthetic projective geometry makes no such algebraic presupposition.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Pappus's theorem is logically independent from other projective axioms, proven by existence of non-Pappian projective geometries.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Coordinate fields arising in projective geometry require commutativity for standard analytic representations, which Pappus guarantees.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The theorem's role in establishing field commutativity demonstrates algebraic structure not implicit in pure projective incidence axioms.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.