Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Paraconsistent logics preserve ¬(p ∧ ¬p) as valid in most... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→In paraconsistent logics like Priest's LP, contradictions can be true without trivializing the system, so K(p ∧ ¬Kp) being both assertible and deniable need not yield absurdity.

    Paraconsistent logics preserve ¬(p ∧ ¬p) as valid in most systems (weak explosion); they don't genuinely tolerate true contradictions, only shift the problem.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Connections

    1 linked claim

    In paraconsistent logics like Priest's LP, contradictions can be true without tr...

    Related

    In paraconsistent logics like Priest's LP, contradictions can be true without tr...

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective