Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Parfit's work on non-identity demonstrates that potential persons who would not otherwise exist cannot coherently be said to be wronged by being brought into existence.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Wronging need not require comparative harm; creating a life of severe suffering can be wrong even if non-existence isn't 'better.'
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Parents can violate duties to future people by choosing procreation under conditions predictably causing suffering.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The non-identity problem may show limits in one harm concept but not eliminate all moral wrongs in reproductive choices.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Harm requires making someone worse off than they otherwise would have been in a counterfactual comparison.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Non-existence is not a state that can be worse or better—it involves no experiences or welfare to compare.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Without an alternative scenario where the same person exists with better conditions, no coherent harm claim can be made.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.