Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Particular empirical laws are necessary in the sense that... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Particular empirical laws are necessary in the sense that they are determined in relation to actual perceptions in accordance with the general conditions of experience.

    CausationModality & Possibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    2 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.An effect can be cognized as necessary on the basis of an empirical law relating it to its cause, where the effect's connection with the actual is determined in accordance with the general conditions of experience.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The general conditions of experience essentially include the pure laws of the understanding (i.e., the principles of the understanding).
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Particular empirical laws are determined in relation to actual perceptions in the same way that effects are determined in relation to their causes under empirical laws.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Hume's regularity theory shows necessity is a psychological projection onto constant conjunctions, not a feature of empirical laws themselves.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If necessity derives from the mind's habits rather than world-structures, particular empirical laws carry no genuine modal force beyond observed regularities.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Kant's transcendental conditions ground necessity in cognition's form, but this epistemic necessity cannot be transferred to the content of particular empirical laws.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Kripke's a posteriori necessities demonstrate that necessity in natural laws is metaphysically grounded in essences, not in conditions of possible experience.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If particular empirical laws like 'water boils at 100°C' are necessary due to microphysical essences, their necessity is independent of Kantian experiential conditions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityCausation

    Connections

    1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge2 linked

    Related

    An effect can be cognized as necessary on the basis of an empirical law relating...Hume's regularity theory shows necessity is a psychological projection onto cons...If necessity derives from the mind's habits rather than world-structures, partic...If particular empirical laws like 'water boils at 100°C' are necessary due to mi...
    +4 moreShow less
    Kant's transcendental conditions ground necessity in cognition's form, but this ...Kripke's a posteriori necessities demonstrate that necessity in natural laws is ...Particular empirical laws are determined in relation to actual perceptions in th...The general conditions of experience essentially include the pure laws of the un...

    Similar

    Particular empirical laws are determined in relation to actual percept...91%An effect can be cognized as necessary on the basis of an empirical la...86%A merely subjective empirical rule of constant conjunction among perce...80%If 'laws of nature' means empirical laws, then a departure from empiri...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: kant-hume-causality
    View source passageHide passage
    In the discussion of the third Postulate Kant says that we can cognize an effect as necessary on the basis of an empirical law relating it to its cause—where the effect’s “connection with the actual is determined in accordance with the general conditions of experience” (A218/B266). Kant is suggesting, therefore, that the precise sense in which particular empirical laws themselves become necessary is that they, too, are “determined” in relation to actual perceptions “in accordance with the genera
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (1 for, 2 against)
    Edits
    1 edit