Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Pascal's Wager contains an internal contradiction
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
The argument can be read as assuming no probability is assigned to God's existence (decision under uncertainty)
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A later passage assumes a positive probability is assigned to God's existence
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
These two assumptions are mutually contradictory
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Browse more in Natural Theology
Related propositions within the same area of thought.