Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Passages in which Shaftesbury's character Theocles assert... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Aesthetics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Passages in which Shaftesbury's character Theocles asserts that material things cannot possess beauty do not represent Shaftesbury's considered view.

    AestheticsTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.In those passages, Theocles has been carried away by his own rhetoric rather than expressing a settled philosophical position.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Elsewhere, Shaftesbury (via Theocles) affirms that physical things can be beautiful.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    AestheticsTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    Elsewhere, Shaftesbury (via Theocles) affirms that physical things can be beauti...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    In those passages, Theocles has been carried away by his own rhetoric rather tha...

    Similar

    Moritz's claim that Kant's conception of beauty is essentially the sam...79%The beauty attributed to material objects can be real even though mate...79%Reid's theory of material beauty is compatible with realism about beau...79%Aesthetic thought cannot coherently treat beauty as a bare property — ...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: shaftesbury
    View source passageHide passage
    Adherents of the instrumentalist interpretation take Shaftesbury’s points about beauty of mind and the hierarchy as evidence that Shaftesbury thinks physical objects are not really beautiful at all, and that we should aspire to care only about the beauty of minds (see especially Tiffany 1923). On this view, the beauty of objects (including all art) is merely an early stage of appreciation of beauty that the wise person eventually leaves behind. Against this interpretation, however, Glauser argue
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit