Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Patricia Churchland and eliminative materialists argue th... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The theoretical and conceptual resources adequate for the substrate or realization level need not be adequate for the realized level

    Patricia Churchland and eliminative materialists argue that positing irreducibly distinct conceptual levels often reflects folk-psychological bias rather than genuine ontological stratification.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Conceptual levels(as what the statement discusses)
    Different ways of describing or explaining the same thing, like explaining behavior in terms of psychology versus neurobiology versus physics.
    Folk-psychological bias(as a potential error the statement warns against)
    The tendency to rely on everyday, common-sense ideas about how minds work (like saying 'I believe' or 'I want') rather than on scientific facts about the brain.
    Irreducibly distinct(as a description of how ordo and methodus are fundamentally different from each other)
    Completely separate and different in ways that cannot be simplified or combined—meaning these two functions cannot be merged into one without losing their unique characteristics.
    Ontological
    "Ontological" refers to questions about what actually exists or is real. It's concerned with the fundamental nature of being—asking "What kinds of things are there?" rather than "How do we know about them?" For example, an ontological question might be whether numbers, ideas, or God actually exist as real things, or if they're just human inventions.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Patricia Churchland(as a philosopher who critiques evolutionary psychology arguments)
    A contemporary philosopher known for studying how neuroscience and biology can explain the mind and human behavior, challenging purely philosophical approaches.
    Stratification(in formal logic and set theory)
    In Quine's logic, a property of formulas where you can assign levels or ranks to variables in a way that respects the rules of the system—essentially, a formal way of keeping things organized and consistent.
    eliminative materialism(philosophy of mind)
    The view that folk psychological states (such as beliefs and propositional memories) do not exist because nothing in a successful scientific account of cognition shares the central properties attributed to those states

    Connections

    1 topic

    Consciousness & Mind1 linked

    Related

    The theoretical and conceptual resources adequate for the substrate or realizati...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective