Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Perfect beatitude logically requires the absence of grief, and awareness of damned loved ones would constitute an irresolvable source of suffering in Heaven.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Perfect beatitude might involve transformed emotions where grief becomes retrospective understanding rather than present suffering.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The argument assumes memory and awareness necessarily produce suffering; transformed consciousness might hold knowledge without anguish.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A truly infinite good could rationally coexist with acceptance of cosmic injustice; beatitude need not require ignorance to be complete.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Beatitude is defined as the highest human good; grief is a form of suffering; suffering is incompatible with the highest good.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Knowledge of a loved one's eternal torment would create persistent empathetic pain that rational acceptance cannot eliminate.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A perfectly benevolent God would not permit His greatest gift (Heaven) to be experienced as incomplete or marred by compassion.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.