Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Perfect moral goodness, properly understood as virtue, presupposes the real availability of vicious alternatives that God demonstrably lacks.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Virtue could consist in stable dispositions toward good that require no temptation; a saint with no violent impulses still exhibits courage.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
God's inability to do evil reflects infinite excellence, not moral deficiency; Superman's invincibility doesn't negate his heroism.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Virtue defined as choice-dependent conflates moral psychology with metaphysical goodness; these may come apart at the divine level.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Virtue requires deliberative choice between genuinely available alternatives; without real temptation, moral choice becomes mechanical.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
God's necessity precludes vice; therefore God cannot possess virtue properly understood as hard-won excellence through moral struggle.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Human moral development depends on overcoming real vicious inclinations; this developmental model suggests virtue requires such struggle.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.