Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Perfect power is generically identical with any submaxima... — Carmelics
    Home/Divine Attributes
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Perfect power is generically identical with any submaximal degree of power.

    Divine Attributes
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    2 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Power is an attribute that admits of degrees.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Perfect power is quite naturally viewed as the maximal degree of power.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Generic identity requires that two things share all essential properties, not merely that one is the limit of the other's scale.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A maximal degree of a property differs in kind from submaximal degrees when the maximum involves no potentiality or limitation whatsoever.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Aquinas's actus purus doctrine holds that pure actuality is categorically distinct from beings that merely approximate it along a continuum.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.If perfect power entails necessary existence and aseity, it cannot be generically identical with contingent powers that lack these modal properties.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Scotus argued that infinite being is not the upper bound of a univocal scale but a qualitatively distinct mode of being that transforms every attribute predicated of it.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    Divine Attributes

    Related

    A maximal degree of a property differs in kind from submaximal degrees when the ...Aquinas's actus purus doctrine holds that pure actuality is categorically distin...Generic identity requires that two things share all essential properties, not me...If perfect power entails necessary existence and aseity, it cannot be genericall...
    +3 moreShow less
    Perfect power is quite naturally viewed as the maximal degree of power.Power is an attribute that admits of degrees.Scotus argued that infinite being is not the upper bound of a univocal scale but...

    Similar

    Perfect power is quite naturally viewed as the maximal degree of power...81%Perfect power is identical to God.80%The optimal degree of power may fall short of maximal power if maximal...75%God's power is not the maximum, or limit simpliciter, of an ordered se...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: divine-simplicity
    View source passageHide passage
    At first glance, this may appear to be a senseless suggestion. Power is an attribute that admits of degrees. Perfect power is therefore quite naturally viewed as the maximal degree of power. So viewed, perfect power is generically identical with any submaximal degree of power. According to Miller, however, there is an important distinction between a limit simpliciter and a limit case. A limit simpliciter differs merely in degree from that of which it is the limit simpliciter, whereas a limit case differs absolutely from that of which it is the limit case. Thus the limit simpliciter of an F is ...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (1 for, 2 against)
    Edits
    1 edit