Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Personal identity under counterfactual origin scenarios admits of degrees or partial overlap rather than a strict yes/no answer.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Numerical identity is a logical relation governed by Leibniz's Law: it is necessarily all-or-nothing, admitting no degrees.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Psychic or psychological overlap describes qualitative similarity, not numerical identity, and conflating them commits a category error.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Kripke's modal essentialism establishes that an individual either originates from a given sperm-egg pair or does not—there is no metaphysically intermediate case.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Parfit's reductionist framework, which grounds degrees-of-identity talk, entails that personal identity itself is not what matters—undermining rather than supporting degree-based identity claims.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If identity admits of degrees, transitivity fails, generating contradictions: a series of overlapping creatures could chain Jones to a numerically distinct individual.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
A creature created from slightly modified sperm and the same egg would have had a kind of overlap of psychic constitution with Jones.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Overlap of psychic constitution admits of degrees, unlike strict numerical identity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Therefore, whether Jones would have existed is not a binary fact but a matter of degree.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42