Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Peter Damian argued that God can restore virginity retroactively, suggesting omnipotence may include power over logical and historical necessity.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
True omnipotence doesn't include logical contradictions; retroactively changing the past while keeping present reality intact is self-contradictory.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If past events can be rewritten while their effects remain, causality becomes meaningless and knowledge becomes impossible.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Grounding omnipotence in ability to violate logic makes the concept unintelligible rather than maximally powerful.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Omnipotence logically requires power over all possibilities, including altering past states without changing present facts.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Logical necessity derives from created concepts; God transcends creation and can redefine the framework in which logic operates.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If God cannot alter the past, His power is constrained by time itself—making time a force independent of divine will.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.