Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Philoponus's own argument that prime matter possesses three-dimensional extension as its defining characteristic undermines the claim that abstraction produces something genuinely characterless.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Three-dimensional extension may be a necessary container for matter rather than a positive characteristic intrinsic to it.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Being characterless could mean lacking all determinate qualities (like color, shape) while still requiring spatial dimensionality as a precondition.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Philoponus's extension is logically separable from form; abstraction removes qualities while space remains as pure receptivity, not characterization.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.If prime matter possesses three-dimensional extension essentially, it retains a definite positive attribute after abstraction.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Characterlessness requires complete absence of any defining features, but extension is a defining feature of Philoponus's prime matter.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Abstraction that leaves extension intact fails to produce the radical formlessness classical theories claim characterizes prime matter.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.