Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Philosophical concepts, for Collingwood, are necessarily ... — Carmelics
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Collingwood's engagement with the ontological proof does not establish substantive ontological conclusions, contrary to the orthodox interpretation.

    Philosophical concepts, for Collingwood, are necessarily instantiated in forms of judgement or inference, not contingently instantiated in empirical classes of objects.

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Philosophy of Language2 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Collingwood's concern with the ontological proof was connected with delineating ...Collingwood's engagement with the ontological proof does not establish substanti...For Collingwood, 'God' denotes 'that which we are thinking about when we are thi...

    Similar

    These philosophical concepts are necessarily instantiated in the judge...83%Such a concept would be a phenomenal concept grounded in acquaintance,...81%Philosophical concepts are necessarily instantiated in the forms of ju...80%Metaphysical concepts do not generate predictions verifiable at the le...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: collingwood
    View source passageHide passage
    The question concerning the relation between Collingwood’s two metaphilosophical treatises and whether the conception of the role of philosophical analysis articulated in An Essay on Metaphysics is continuous with that described in An Essay on Philosophical Method is further complicated by the fact that An Essay on Philosophical Method contains a defence of the ontological argument that appears to be at odds with Collingwood’s later claim that metaphysics is a logical, not an ontological inquiry

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective