Skip to content

Topics Thinkers Changes ContributorsLoading account…

Carmelics

A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

Navigate

Topics
Search
Recent Changes
Contribute
How It Works
Glossary
Thinkers
Contributors
About
Statistics
Terms
Privacy

Database

Statements: —
Perspectives: —
Topics: —

Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

Made within

DC&

Austin

Statements: 321,452
Perspectives: 108,905
Topics: 42

Plantinga's modal ontological argument is widely acknowle... — Carmelics

History Edit See Inverse

Part of a larger discussion

Challenges→No known ontological argument for the existence of God is persuasive.

Plantinga's modal ontological argument is widely acknowledged as logically valid, making 'unpersuasive' a matter of disputed rational acceptability, not logical failure.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

Key Terms

knowledge(Distinguished from mere true belief, which may be the product of indoctrination and need not exercise deliberative capacities.): Justified true belief — true belief that has been arrived at through the exercise of deliberative capacities, including comparison of and deliberation among alternatives.

Connections

1 topic

Natural Theology1 linked

Next step

Based on where you are in your exploration

Explore a random proposition

Start fresh with something unrelated.

Related

No known ontological argument for the existence of God is persuasive.

Details

Type: claim
Perspectives: 0 (0 for, 0 against)
Edits: 1 edit

Open for perspectives

This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

Share the first perspective