Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Plantinga's modal ontological argument shows that if maximal greatness is possible, it is actual, and no parody replicates this modal structure with a coherent property.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.The intuition that maximal greatness is possible begs the question: it presupposes the very conclusion the argument aims to establish.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Parodies using abstract or evaluative properties (maximal sexiness, maximal impressiveness) seem equally coherent and possible as maximal greatness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.S5's validity depends on metaphysical assumptions about modal accessibility that aren't obviously true and remain philosophically contested.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Maximal greatness is coherent: it entails only logically compatible perfections like omnipotence, omniscience, and moral perfection.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If a property is possibly exemplified, S5 modal logic entails it's actually exemplified in at least one possible world.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Parody arguments fail because properties like maximal snootiness or maximal pizza-ness either lack coherence or aren't intrinsically evaluative.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.