Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Platonic eros in the Symposium is not merely lack-based desire but also an overflowing creative impulse toward generation in beauty.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Diotima explicitly defines eros as desiring what one lacks; creative impulse remains derivative of this fundamental lack-structure.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
'Generation' in the Symposium serves lack-based continuity: mortals create offspring because they cannot be eternal themselves.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Diotima's ladder describes ascent toward Beauty itself, implying positive attraction upward, not merely compensating for deficiency.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Plato describes lovers as 'pregnant in soul,' suggesting generative capacity that exceeds responding to lack.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The immortality through offspring and legacy indicates eros aims at creating lasting value, not just satisfying absence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.