Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Platonists and rationalists have not genuinely verified their theories by observation; they have made an induction from rational introspection.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Platonists and rationalists claim verification because they have observed what reason reveals to them.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Such 'observation' is actually rational introspection, not sensible observation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Kant demonstrated that pure reason's self-examination generates antinomies, showing rational introspection is not a reliable verification procedure.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If rational introspection were genuine observation, disagreeing rationalists could resolve disputes by re-examining the same rational faculty, but persistent disagreement persists.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Quine argued in 'Epistemology Naturalized' that any verification divorced from causal contact with the world collapses into circular self-justification.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Platonists posit abstract objects causally inert to the mind, so introspective 'access' cannot constitute observation in any epistemically robust sense recognized by causal theories of knowledge.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.