Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Polynomial-time reducibility as a canonical equivalence r... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The Boolean Halting Problem (BHP) is in P only if P equals NP

    Polynomial-time reducibility as a canonical equivalence relation depends on the Church-Turing thesis applied to feasibility, which Wilfried Sieg and others treat as a substantive empirical assumption.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Church-Turing thesis(Presented as a thesis about the upper bound of computational power, not a proven fact.)
    The thesis that no computational system stronger than the class of Turing machines exists.
    Equivalence relation(One of the three conditions in the inconsistent triad)
    A relation that is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive; identity relations are standardly taken to be equivalence relations.
    Feasibility(as used in logic and computation)
    Whether something is actually possible to do in practice, considering real-world limitations like time and resources—not just theoretically possible.
    Polynomial-time reducibility(as used in computer science and computational theory)
    A way of transforming one difficult problem into another difficult problem such that if you can solve the second one quickly, you can solve the first one quickly too.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Substantive empirical assumption(The status of the independence between states and acts in Jeffrey's theory)
    A claim about the real world that requires actual observation or evidence to prove or disprove—it's not something that's automatically true just by definition.
    Wilfried Sieg(modern philosopher of mathematics)
    A contemporary philosopher and logician who studies how we can break down and verify complex mathematical proofs into simpler, checkable pieces.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Proof of definition segments1 linkedTruth & Knowledge1 linked

    Related

    The Boolean Halting Problem (BHP) is in P only if P equals NP

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective