Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Possibilism can ground modal truth in abstract possible worlds as primitive entities rather than in the modal properties of concrete individuals.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Positing infinite abstract possible worlds multiplies entities beyond necessity when modal facts might ground in concrete causal powers.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The notion of 'primitive abstract worlds' lacks explanatory content—it treats the puzzle of modality as solved by stipulation, not understanding.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Modal truths correlate with genuine properties and dispositions of concrete things; grounding them elsewhere severs explanatory connection.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Modal facts about what could have been are explanatorily basic and need not reduce to non-modal properties of actual concrete things.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Possible worlds provide a unified semantics for counterfactuals, necessity, and possibility without invoking sparse primitive properties.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Abstract entities can be ontologically innocent if they're logically indispensable for our best scientific and mathematical theories.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.