Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Post-Quinean naturalism has structurally displaced aprioristic grand system-building as a legitimate methodology in analytic philosophy.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Contemporary metaphysicians like David Lewis construct elaborate a priori systems rivaling pre-Quinean grand theory, contradicting the claim.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Naturalism itself functions as an aprioristic commitment that cannot be empirically validated, so it hasn't eliminated a priori methodology.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The claim conflates institutional shifts in analytic philosophy with actual displacement of a priori reasoning from legitimate methodological options.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Quine's critique of the analytic/synthetic distinction undermined the epistemological foundation for a priori system-building in philosophy.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Empirically-informed philosophy of mind and language has produced more tractable problems than pre-Quinean aprioristic metaphysics.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The professionalization of analytic philosophy now rewards piecemeal, empirically-constrained work over ambitious unified theoretical systems.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.