Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Posthumous events that appear to devalue accomplishments merely alter survivors' assessments, not the intrinsic value of the life as actually lived.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Value can be relational: a scientist's discovery remains significant even if future work reveals it was built on fraud.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Posthumous revelations often uncover facts about actual conduct, not mere reassessments—they change what was truly done.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If accomplishments depend partly on their consequences and legacy, posthumous events that destroy that legacy do devalue them.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Value intrinsic to an action depends on the agent's knowledge and intentions at the time, not future discoveries.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A life's worth is constituted by what was actually experienced and achieved, not by how others later reinterpret it.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Conflating objective accomplishment with subjective assessment risks making all value hostage to changing opinion.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.