Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Powers are individuated by their manifestations, but two distinct determinables can share identical power-subsets across all possible worlds.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
If two determinables share identical power-subsets in all worlds, they produce identical effects everywhere. Identity of effects entails identity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Individuating powers by manifestations commits us to manifestation-identity determining property identity—contradicting the initial claim.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Possible worlds where determinables differ but powers align are arguably metaphysically incoherent or explanatorily redundant.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Powers are fundamentally about what things do, not what they are. Manifestation is the essence of causal efficacy.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Properties can differ in intrinsic nature while producing identical causal effects across all possible worlds.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Identity conditions need not track every metaphysical distinction—powers concern functional roles, not underlying essence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.