Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Practices like whale-hunting or killing elephants for ivo... — Carmelics
    Home/Environmental Ethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Utilitarian ethics cannot straightforwardly serve as an adequate environmental ethic.

    Practices like whale-hunting or killing elephants for ivory, which cause non-human suffering, could be justified under utilitarianism if the human interest-satisfaction they produce outweighs the non-human interest-frustration.

    Environmental Ethics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Environmental Ethics

    Key Terms

    Interest-frustration(describing what animals experience when hunted or poached)
    When a being's desires, needs, or preferences are blocked or prevented—like when an animal is harmed, killed, or separated from its family.
    Interest-satisfaction(describing what humans gain from hunting and ivory trade)
    When a being's desires, needs, or preferences are fulfilled—like when an animal gets food, safety, or comfort.
    Non-human suffering(referring to the harm experienced by whales and elephants)
    Pain, distress, or negative experiences felt by animals and other living creatures (not people).

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Environmental Ethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Outweighs(comparing human benefits against animal harm in utilitarian calculations)
    Is greater than or more important than when you're comparing two things on a scale.
    Utilitarianism(One of Sidgwick's three methods of ethics)
    The view that an individual self-evidently ought to aim at the maximum balance of happiness for all sentient beings present and future, whatever the cost to herself; also called Universalistic Hedonism

    Related

    Environmental ethics requires attributing moral concern to non-sentient natural ...Non-sentient objects such as plant species, rivers, mountains, and landscapes ha...Utilitarian ethics attributes intrinsic value only to the experience of pleasure...Utilitarian ethics cannot straightforwardly serve as an adequate environmental e...

    Similar

    Virtue ethics need not be unavoidably anthropocentric and can support ...74%Genuine concern for nature as an end in itself is not reducible to hum...73%Non-sentient objects such as plant species, rivers, mountains, and lan...72%By analogy, a flourishing human life requires the moral capacity to va...72%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: ethics-environmental
    View source passageHide passage
    As the utilitarian focus is the balance of pleasure and pain as such, the question of to whom a pleasure or pain belongs is irrelevant to the calculation and assessment of the rightness or wrongness of actions. Hence, the eighteenth century utilitarian Jeremy Bentham (1789), and later Peter Singer (1993), have argued that the interests of all the sentient beings (i.e., beings who are capable of experiencing pleasure or pain)—including non-human ones—affected by an action should be taken equally

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective