Priest and Berto's work on impossible worlds shows that formal consistency within a non-classical logic does not preclude the described scenario from obtaining in no possible world.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Berto(as a philosopher who built on Rantala's work): Francesco Berto, a contemporary philosopher who developed and expanded impossible-worlds semantics further, making it more useful for analyzing belief and knowledge.
Formal consistency(what the argument contrasts with explanatory success): Whether a system of logic or mathematics follows its own rules without contradiction—if the rules don't contradict each other, the system is consistent.
Non-classical logic(the type of logical infrastructure involved): A system of reasoning that doesn't follow the traditional rules of logic (like the law of contradiction); these are alternatives developed to handle special cases or problems that regular logic struggles with.
Priest: A priest is a religious official who has been ordained or formally appointed to lead spiritual ceremonies and guide people in their faith. Priests typically perform rituals like weddings, funerals, and religious services, and they often serve as counselors and teachers within their religious community. The specific duties and authority of a priest vary depending on the religion—for example, Catholic priests administer sacraments, while Protestant ministers may have different roles.

Based on where you are in your exploration