Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Priest and others in the dialetheist tradition argue some... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→This revision is equivalent to (D1).

    Priest and others in the dialetheist tradition argue some true contradictions resist clean negation into a distinct true proposition.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Self-referential sentences like the liar paradox ('this sentence is false') generate genuine contradictions that negation cannot resolve into consistent truth.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Classical logic's explosion principle (from contradiction, anything follows) makes false predictions about rational discourse where contradictions appear contained.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Some semantic properties may be fundamentally non-bivalent; negating a true contradiction yields another true contradiction, not a distinct true proposition.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.If contradictions truly resist negation into distinct propositions, dialetheism itself cannot be formulated coherently using standard logical language.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Paraconsistent logic still requires some distinction between truth-values; claiming negation fails entirely contradicts the logical structure dialetheism relies upon.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Self-referential paradoxes more plausibly reflect limitations in language or semantic theory than genuine true contradictions in reality.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Divine Attributes1 linked

    Related

    Classical logic's explosion principle (from contradiction, anything follows) mak...If contradictions truly resist negation into distinct propositions, dialetheism ...Paraconsistent logic still requires some distinction between truth-values; claim...Self-referential paradoxes more plausibly reflect limitations in language or sem...
    +3 moreShow less
    Self-referential sentences like the liar paradox ('this sentence is false') gene...Some semantic properties may be fundamentally non-bivalent; negating a true cont...This revision is equivalent to (D1).

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit