Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Privileged access to the existence of a thought-type is logically independent of access to the environmental conditions constituting its content.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Understanding what type of thought one has requires grasping its conceptual content, which presupposes environmental knowledge.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Privileged access to thoughts' existence necessarily includes partial access to their content-constituting conditions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Isolating existence-access from content-access creates a false distinction; thought-types are inherently content-individuated.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Introspective certainty about mental states requires no empirical investigation of external world conditions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A subject can know they are thinking without knowing what their thoughts are about or represent.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Content-determination depends on historical and relational facts external to consciousness; privileged access does not.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.