Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Process theologians like Whitehead and Hartshorne argue G... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→God cannot change physically (God is physically immutable).

    Process theologians like Whitehead and Hartshorne argue God has a 'consequent nature' that is genuinely affected by and responsive to the physical world.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.A God indifferent to creation's suffering seems morally inferior to one genuinely moved by and responsive to actual creaturely experience.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Classical omniscience makes divine foreknowledge of free acts logically problematic; a temporal God avoids this contradiction entirely.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Genuine relationship requires mutual responsiveness; a static God cannot truly love or be loved by creation in any meaningful sense.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.If God's nature genuinely changes through time, God becomes dependent on creation and loses the independence essential to being divine.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Process theology sacrifices traditional divine omnipotence and perfect power for philosophical consistency, weakening God's salvific capacity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The claim rests on assuming classical theism's problems (omniscience paradoxes) are unsolvable, but compatibilist solutions remain viable alternatives.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Divine Attributes1 linked

    Related

    A God indifferent to creation's suffering seems morally inferior to one genuinel...Classical omniscience makes divine foreknowledge of free acts logically problema...Genuine relationship requires mutual responsiveness; a static God cannot truly l...God cannot change physically (God is physically immutable).
    +3 moreShow less
    If God's nature genuinely changes through time, God becomes dependent on creatio...Process theology sacrifices traditional divine omnipotence and perfect power for...The claim rests on assuming classical theism's problems (omniscience paradoxes) ...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit