Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Projective geometry presupposes an ambient space with enough structure to define collinearity, harmonic conjugates, and incidence relations.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Projective geometry can be defined purely axiomatically (Desargues' theorem, axioms of incidence) without reference to any ambient space whatsoever.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Harmonic conjugates and cross-ratios are definable through synthetic constructions (complete quadrilaterals) that don't require metric or field structure.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Modern category-theoretic formulations treat projective geometry as a structure arising from abstract incidence axioms, not presupposing ambient space.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Harmonic conjugates and cross-ratios require a field structure that presupposes an underlying ambient space with metric or affine properties.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Incidence relations (point-line containment) are meaningless without a topological or set-theoretic framework defining distinct geometric objects.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Collinearity presupposes a notion of 'betweenness' or alignment that only emerges from an ordered or structured ambient continuum.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.