Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Properties not fixed by an internally grasped description... — Carmelics
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→If descriptivism about natural kind terms is false, the characteristic properties of a natural kind are not knowable a priori but must be uncovered by scientific investigation.

    Properties not fixed by an internally grasped description cannot be known a priori.

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    Descriptivism holds that the meaning of a natural kind term is a description kno...If descriptivism about natural kind terms is false, the characteristic propertie...If descriptivism is false, the properties that determine kind membership are not...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    An a priori claim that fails to rest on strong premises cannot be acce...74%The requirement on recognizing an a priori entitlement cannot be that ...74%What cannot be comprehended a priori from concepts cannot have been ge...73%The only available ground for such knowledge is that the forms known a...73%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: natural-kinds
    View source passageHide passage
    Much recent interest in natural kinds has been stimulated by debates concerning the semantics of natural kind terms, originating especially with the work of Saul Kripke (1972) and Hilary Putnam (1973, 1975a). Typical natural kind expressions fall into one of two categories: predicates (is water, is gold, is a tiger, and is an oak) and singular terms (water, gold, the tiger, and the oak). In this section we survey some of the debates concerning the meaning of such terms, what—if anything—they ref

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective