Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Proponents of individualist formulations of contractualis... — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Contractualists can maintain that contractualism is distinctive at both the normative and meta-ethical levels

    Proponents of individualist formulations of contractualism can reject Parfit's intuitions as non-neutral

    Moral ResponsibilitySocial Contract
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilitySocial Contract

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Skepticism
    1 linked

    Related

    Contractualists are not obligated to accept the convergence argument's framingContractualists can maintain that contractualism is distinctive at both the norm...

    Similar

    The original formulation of contractualism retains individualist and i...80%Scanlon's original contractualism allows an individual to reject optim...79%Impersonal contractualism represents an abandonment of core contractua...77%Under contractualism, a principle is impermissible if any individual h...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: contractualism
    View source passageHide passage
    There is a methodological issue here. In his presentation of the convergence argument, Parfit tests competing versions of contractualism against intuitions regarding specific idealised cases. This is not a peculiarity of Parfit’s own presentation. Without intuitions of this kind, the convergence argument cannot get off the ground. Proponents of individualist formulations of contractualism might reply that, in some key cases, Parfit’s intuitions are not neutral benchmarks, but rather reflect the

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective