Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Proposition-parts are subsentential ways of presenting fu... — Carmelics
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The proposition that Hesperus is bright can be distinguished from the proposition that Phosphorus is bright

    Proposition-parts are subsentential ways of presenting functions and arguments

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    'Hesperus' and 'Phosphorus' present Venus in different ways, yielding different ...Propositions are sentential ways of presenting truth-valuesThe proposition that Hesperus is bright can be distinguished from the propositio...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    Propositions have parts that correspond to functions, specifically con...78%Frege held that propositions have parts that correspond to functions.77%For the representation of space, places (the 'parts') are obtained onl...75%A particular argument goes together with a function (not a set) to mak...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: logical-form
    View source passageHide passage
    Frege also made a different kind of contribution, which would prove important, to the study of propositions. In early work, he spoke as though propositional constituents were the relevant functions and (ordered n-tuples of) entities that such functions map to truth-values. But he later refined this view in light of his distinction between Sinn and Bedeutung; see the entry on Frege. The Sinn of an expression was said to be a “way of presenting” the corresponding Bedeutung, which might be an ent

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective