Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Providing a general definition of art applicable to all art is particularly complex
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Proceduralist definitions (Dickie's Institutional Theory) classify art by relational context, not intrinsic properties, accommodating any object including conceptual works.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If the artworld's conferral of status suffices to define art, conceptual art's revisionary nature is absorbed by the definition rather than defeating it.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Wittgenstein's family resemblance framework shows that open-textured concepts can function reliably without necessary and sufficient conditions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The difficulty of defining art under conceptual challenges reflects normal concept elasticity, not a principled impossibility of general definition.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Conceptual art is profoundly revisionary and difficult to classify
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The advent of conceptual art challenges any attempt at a general definition of art
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.