Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Pruss and Swinburne reject absolute explanation for compl... — Carmelics
    Home/Natural Theology
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The version of the PSR used by traditional defenders of the cosmological argument is inadequate because it fails to provide the best explanation for the universe.

    Pruss and Swinburne reject absolute explanation for complete explanations, where the effect is explained fully by the cause but no explanation of the cause at the time of occurrence is required.

    Natural Theology
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Natural Theology

    Key Terms

    Complete explanations(as contrasted with absolute explanation)
    An explanation where the cause fully accounts for why the effect happened, with nothing left unexplained about the effect itself.
    Pruss and Swinburne(as named philosophers being cited for a specific position)
    Alexander Pruss and Richard Swinburne are contemporary philosophers who argue about why things exist and how we can explain the universe; they've written extensively about God, causation, and explanation.
    absolute explanation(as used in metaphysics)
    A complete reason or cause for why something exists or is the way it is, with no gaps or unanswered questions left over.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Natural Theology
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    cause(Philosophical definition of causation requiring both sufficiency and necessity of the cause relative to its effect)
    An event or state of things such that (a) if it happens or exists, the effect must happen or exist even if no further conditions are fulfilled, and (b) the effect cannot happen or exist unless the cause happens or exists.
    effect(Correlate of 'cause' in the defined causal relation)
    An event or state of things that is caused — it must occur if the cause occurs, and cannot occur unless the cause occurs.

    Related

    The best explanation required of a sound cosmological argument is an absolute ex...The version of the PSR used by traditional defenders of the cosmological argumen...

    Similar

    Traditional defenders of the cosmological argument cannot invoke the r...77%But something without an explanation would violate the Principle of Su...76%Everything that exists has an absolute explanation for its existence (...76%If God grounds the very processes science describes, scientific explan...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: cosmological-argument
    View source passageHide passage
    However, if we understand “necessary being” in this sense, we can dispose of the cosmological argument as irrelevant; what is needed rather is an argument to establish that God’s existence understood as logically necessary is possible, for if it is possible that it is necessary that God exists, then necessarily God exists (by Axiom S5). However, this need not be the sense in which “necessary being” is understood in the cosmological argument. A more adequate notion of necessary being is that the necessity is metaphysical or factual (Hick 1960). A necessary being is one that if it exists, it ne...

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective