Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Pseudo-Dionysius and the apophatic tradition hold that di... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The distance between God and any thing in space is zero (the 'Zero Thesis').

    Pseudo-Dionysius and the apophatic tradition hold that divine attributes resist positive quantification, including relational magnitudes like distance.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Divine transcendence logically entails that God exceeds all conceptual categories, including spatial and quantifiable relations we impose on creation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Apophatic theology accurately describes our epistemic limits: we can only negate false claims about God, never positively define divine nature.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Asserting measurable distance between God and creatures anthropomorphizes the infinite, reducing transcendence to a comprehensible magnitude.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.If divine attributes completely resist quantification, we cannot meaningfully affirm God's omnipresence or distinguish it from absence or indifference.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Scripture uses relational language about God's closeness and distance; treating these as purely ineffable abandons revelation's communicative intent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Even apophatic claims ("God is not distant") implicitly invoke relational concepts; absolute negation of quantifiable attributes is self-refuting.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Afterlife & Death1 linked

    Related

    Apophatic theology accurately describes our epistemic limits: we can only negate...Asserting measurable distance between God and creatures anthropomorphizes the in...Divine transcendence logically entails that God exceeds all conceptual categorie...Even apophatic claims ("God is not distant") implicitly invoke relational concep...
    +3 moreShow less
    If divine attributes completely resist quantification, we cannot meaningfully af...Scripture uses relational language about God's closeness and distance; treating ...The distance between God and any thing in space is zero (the 'Zero Thesis').

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit