Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Pseudo-irrationals like π' are 'homeless' numbers. — Carmelics
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Pseudo-irrationals like π' are 'homeless' numbers.

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    0 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Pseudo-irrationals do not use the idioms of arithmetic.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Pseudo-irrationals depend upon the particular incidental notation of a particular system (e.g., a particular base).
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    Pseudo-irrationals depend upon the particular incidental notation of a particula...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Pseudo-irrationals do not use the idioms of arithmetic.

    Similar

    π' is not a genuine irrational number.82%The term 'irrational number' should be extended to include lawless and...79%An irrational number is only an extension insofar as it is a sign (a n...78%Pseudo-irrationals do not use the idioms of arithmetic.74%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: wittgenstein-mathematics
    View source passageHide passage
    Although a pseudo-irrational such as \(\pi '\) (on either definition) is “as unambiguous as … \(\pi\) or \(\sqrt{2}\)” (PG 476), it is ‘homeless’ according to Wittgenstein because, instead of using “the idioms of arithmetic” (PR §186), it is dependent upon the particular ‘incidental’ notation of a particular system (i.e., in some particular base) (PR §188; PR §182; and PG 475). If we speak of various base-notational systems, we might say that \(\pi\) belongs to all systems, while \(\pi '\) belon
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (1 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit