Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Psychological continuity of memory chains, not organizational unity, constitutes personal identity (Locke, Essay II.xxvii).
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Memory is fallible and reconstructive; we constantly misremember. Identity should not depend on unreliable psychological states.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Two beings could have overlapping memory chains without being identical; memory alone cannot ground the unity required for genuine identity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Amnesia victims remain the same person despite memory loss, suggesting organizational continuity, not memory, determines identity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Only psychological continuity is directly accessible to us; we know our own memories but never directly access our physical substrates.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Identity follows continuity of consciousness: if you remember experiencing event X, you are the person who experienced X, regardless of bodily change.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Organizational unity (brain/body) can be replaced piecemeal; memory chains survive such replacement, making them more fundamental to identity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.