Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Psychological mechanisms lead us to form fictions of mind... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Talk about minds and external objects beyond perceptions is explicable but meaningless.

    Psychological mechanisms lead us to form fictions of minds and bodies beyond perceptions.

    Consciousness & MindSkepticism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismConsciousness & Mind

    Connections

    2 topics

    Philosophy of Language2 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Truth & Knowledge
    1 linked

    Related

    If one cannot coherently specify what is being doubted, the doubt itself is inco...Talk about minds and external objects beyond perceptions is explicable but meani...We do not really know what we are talking about when we refer to minds and exter...

    Similar

    Some mechanism must be responsible for generating belief-like imaginin...80%The mind contains a belief-forming mechanism responsible for generatin...77%Engagement with fictions does not require positing imaginings as a dis...75%We do not really know what we are talking about when we refer to minds...75%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: idealism
    View source passageHide passage
    Hume’s attack on the supposition that we have an idea of the mind as distinct from its impressions thus constitutes a rejection of Berkeley’s commitment to the existence of mental substances, but not of idealism altogether. On Hume’s account, we are not entitled to assert the existence of both ideas and the minds, human or divine, that have them, but only the existence of the former. At the same time, he does not seem to think that we are forced into skepticism about either minds or external obj

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective