Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Purely instrumental practical reason is limited to discov... — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Practical reason is not purely instrumental

    Purely instrumental practical reason is limited to discovering means to ends dictated by desire or other external sources

    Moral ResponsibilityVirtue Ethics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityVirtue Ethics

    Related

    A law that only identifies means to pre-given ends cannot be self-given by an au...An autonomous agent's self-given law must tell the agent which ends to pursue, n...Practical reason is not purely instrumental

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    A theory in which ends are given by desires or immediate likings and r...82%Practical reason is not purely instrumental80%The concept of a practical reason must be the concept of an explanatio...80%Something other than desire or motivation may be the genuine source of...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: moral-epistemology-a-priori
    View source passageHide passage
    How, specifically, does Kant think that one can establish the categorical imperative a priori? The crucial premise is that practically rational beings are autonomous, in the sense that their wills can be determined by rules they give themselves. Kant holds that the law that an autonomous agent gives to herself must tell her which ends to pursue and not merely which means to employ in light of the ends the agent already has. Kant therefore rejects the more orthodox conception of practical reason

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective