Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Purity-F is false. — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Truth & Knowledge
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Purity-F is false.

    Proof of definition segmentsTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Purity-F is a background premise of both D1 and D4.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.D1 and D2 together entail that a contradiction follows from the hypothesis that the one is, on the assumption that Purity-F is true.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.D1 and D2 together entail that if the one is, then Purity-F is false.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Truth & KnowledgeProof of definition segments

    Connections

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    2 topics

    Modality & Possibility3 linkedPhilosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    D1 and D2 together entail that a contradiction follows from the hypothesis that ...D1 and D2 together entail that if the one is, then Purity-F is false.D5 and D6 together entail that the one is.Purity-F is a background premise of both D1 and D4.

    Similar

    Proposition (E) is false.98%Uniqueness is false.97%The Relational Analysis is false.97%Oneness (or Self-Predication) is false96%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: plato-parmenides
    View source passageHide passage
    Yet another alternative is that detailed logical analysis of the Deductions reveals arguments sufficient to establish both that the one is and, importantly, that principles such as Purity-F and Uniqueness are false. As Rickless (2007, 136–137 and 211) argues, Purity-F is a background premise of both D1 and D4. Taken together, then, D1 and D2 are sufficient to establish that a contradiction follows from the hypothesis that the one is, on the assumption that Purity-F is true. That is, D1 and D2 to
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit