Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Quantifiers can have a domain-conditions reading that is ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Quantifiers can have a domain-conditions reading that is ontologically committing and thus external (deep).

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    0 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.On the domain-conditions reading, 'there are Fs' is true if and only if there exists an entity in the relevant real domain which satisfies 'F'.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Any reading that requires the existence of an entity in a real domain carries ontological commitment.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Ontologically committing readings are deep and thus external.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    1 linked claim

    The domain-conditions reading is ontologically committing and thus deep/external...

    Related

    Any reading that requires the existence of an entity in a real domain carries on...On the domain-conditions reading, 'there are Fs' is true if and only if there ex...Ontologically committing readings are deep and thus external.The domain-conditions reading is ontologically committing and thus deep/external...

    Similar

    The domain-conditions reading is ontologically committing and thus dee...96%A deep (external) reading requires ontological commitment.87%Ontologically committing readings are deep and thus external.81%Any reading that requires the existence of an entity in a real domain ...81%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: propositions
    View source passageHide passage
    Recently, Thomas Hofweber (2005, 2016) has claimed to have found the required pair of readings. A quantifier, he claims, may have either a domain-conditions or inferential role reading. The domain-conditions reading is just the familiar reading we know from first order semantics: ‘there are Fs’ is true iff there exists an entity in the relevant real domain which satisfies ‘F’. This reading is therefore ontologically committing and so deep (and thus external). The inferential reading, by contr
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (1 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit