Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Quine's behaviorist underdetermination therefore undermin... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→There is always empirical uncertainty in attributing understanding even to humans.

    Quine's behaviorist underdetermination therefore undermines itself: meaning is public by constitution, making behavioral criteria for understanding non-accidentally reliable among competent speakers.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Behavioral criteria(how we tell if someone knows what a word means)
    Observable, measurable signs or tests based on what people actually do that help us judge whether someone understands something.
    Non-accidentally reliable(why behavioral tests work for detecting understanding)
    Working reliably not by accident or chance, but for a genuine, systematic reason—the method actually works because of how things fundamentally are, not by coincidence.
    Public by constitution(the essential nature of meaning)
    The idea that meaning is fundamentally social and shared by nature—it only exists because a community of speakers agrees on it, not because it's locked inside individual minds.
    Quine(as a proper name referring to the philosopher whose theory is being discussed)
    Willard Van Orman Quine was a 20th-century American philosopher who wrote about how we know things and how language works. In this statement, we're discussing one of his specific ideas about observation.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    behaviorism
    The view that there is no more to having mental states than being disposed to behave in certain ways.
    competent speakers(as used in linguistics and philosophy of language)
    People who know a language well enough to use its words correctly and understand what others mean when they use them.
    underdetermination(Philosophy of science; here applied (erroneously by some) to Gold's language learnability results)
    The epistemic situation in which a finite body of evidence is insufficient to uniquely determine the correct theory among competing alternatives

    Connections

    2 topics

    Consciousness & Mind1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    There is always empirical uncertainty in attributing understanding even to human...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective